Digital Dentistry Blog

Digital Complete Dentures (3D-Printed Bases + Bonded Teeth): Clinical & Lab Step-by-Step Protocol

Digital Complete Dentures Workflow (Clinic → Lab → CAD)

Switch tabs to view the same protocol from three angles: Clinical (records & validation), Lab (bases, try-in, bonding), and CAD (exocad) (setup + occlusion concept control).

  1. Diagnosis + risk grading: ridge form, mucosal resilience, neuromuscular control, esthetic demand.
  2. Primary acquisition: scan or impression + border molding (capture functional depth/width).
  3. Record bases + occlusion rims: verify stability, lip support, occlusal plane, smile line, midline.
  4. CR + VDO record (non-negotiable): confirm VDO clinically (phonetics + comfort), record CR twice for repeatability, index rims.
  5. Try-in decision: recommended for high esthetic/phonetic risk, uncertain VDO tolerance, unstable mandibular base.
  6. Delivery protocol: pressure indicator check, border comfort, occlusion refinement per concept, follow-up plan.
Professor tip: if CR at selected VDO is not repeatable, choose a more forgiving concept (often monoplane or controlled lingualized) instead of “steep anatomy in CAD”.

In digital complete dentures, most “occlusion problems” are actually record problems. Before you commit to a tooth setup, confirm a repeatable CR at the selected VDO using stable record bases and verified occlusion rims (lip support, occlusal plane, and phonetics). A practical tip: record CR twice at the same VDO and compare; if closures are inconsistent, choose a more forgiving occlusal concept rather than forcing anatomical cusps in CAD. For unstable mandibular bases, monoplane or shallow schemes reduce lateral forces and chairside adjustments. When stability is moderate to good, lingualized occlusion is often the safest “high-performance” option because it centralizes forces and limits buccal interferences. Reserve bilateral balanced setups for cases with truly stable bases, accurate CR/VDO records, and a planned remount protocol—otherwise minor errors can turn into post-delivery tipping and sore spots.

Digital complete dentures clinical workflow mindmap showing aesthetic analysis, impressions, occlusion rims, VDR to VDO, CR record, try-in, delivery, and QC gates.

This is a publication-grade, step-by-step protocol for digital complete dentures using a 3D-printed denture base + separately fabricated teeth (milled PMMA) bonded to the base. The backbone is clinical accuracy: border molding, stable record bases + occlusion rims, and a repeatable CR record at a verified VDO—then disciplined CAD setup (exocad) and strict QC gates.

Positioning statement

Digital tools improve repeatability and communication—but they do not replace fundamentals. If occlusal plane, lip support, phonetics, and CR/VDO are not validated clinically, the most “perfect” CAD setup can still fail at delivery.

Indications, Risk Screening, and When a Try-In Is Non-Negotiable

Good candidates for digital complete dentures

  • Stable ridges and manageable soft tissues
  • Patients prioritizing reproducibility and documented records
  • Cases requiring predictable tooth setup and controlled esthetic characterization

Risk flags (plan extra verification)

  • Severely resorbed mandibular ridge, unstable lower denture history
  • Flabby ridge / mobile mucosa, high frena, shallow vestibules
  • Xerostomia, neuromuscular control limitations, strong gag reflex
  • High esthetic demand, uncertain phonetics, unclear VDO tolerance
Try-in rule

Include a try-in when esthetic risk is high, phonetics are uncertain, VDO is debated, or the mandibular base is unstable. A monolithic printed try-in is faster than remaking a final base or rebonding teeth.

Clinical & Lab Workflow (Printed Base + Milled Teeth + Bonding)

This protocol is structured for predictability. You can compress visits in experienced hands, but do not skip the clinical gates.

Visit 1 (Clinic): Diagnostic baseline + Primary acquisition

  1. Medical/dental history + expectations: previous denture failures, adaptation issues, esthetic priorities.
  2. Ridge and tissue exam: undercuts, flabby ridge, frenal attachments, vestibular depth, saliva quality.
  3. Esthetic references: full-face at rest + full smile, profile for lip support, close-up retractor views.
  4. Functional/phonetic screen: baseline F/V and “S” sound notes (for later VDO verification).
  5. Primary acquisition pathway: IOS (if reliable borders) or preliminary impression for tray workflow.

Lab Phase 1 (Lab): Custom tray + record base strategy

  • If borders are uncertain: fabricate a custom tray (printed or conventional) for true border molding.
  • Plan how you will produce stable record bases (often printed) to carry wax rims without rocking.
  • Prepare rim design approach that supports lip support, plane control, and repeatable jaw relation recording.

Visit 2 (Clinic): Final impression + occlusion rims verification + jaw relation (CR + VDO)

Non-negotiable

Do not record CR before the rim is clinically verified. If the rim is wrong, your CR/VDO record will be wrong—then CAD is wrong.

A) Border molding and final impression (if not already confirmed)

  • Border mold to capture vestibular function and flange extension.
  • Take final impression with a strategy matching tissue behavior (mucostatic vs selective pressure—case dependent).
  • Communicate specific relief zones (flabby ridge, sharp crest, tori).

B) Occlusion rims verification (occlusion block try-in)

  • Base stability: minimal rocking; borders comfortable (no overextension trauma).
  • Lip support: confirmed with profile and rest position.
  • Occlusal plane: oriented to facial references (case-appropriate plane assessment).
  • Incisal display: at rest and smile; confirm midline and canine guides.
  • Phonetics: F/V for incisal edge position; “S” for closest speaking space (VDO screening).

C) Jaw relation record protocol (CR at verified VDO)

  1. Measure VDR (repeat readings; use a consistent method).
  2. Select VDO = VDR − freeway space (individualized; confirm with comfort and phonetics).
  3. Record CR at the selected VDO using stable rim contact (avoid rim slide).
  4. Repeatability check: at least 2 consistent closures before locking the record.
  5. Indexing: notches/grooves to prevent record shift during scanning/digitization.
  6. Send/scan rims in relation for lab mounting (plus reference photos and notes).

Lab Phase 2 (Lab): Digitization + CAD setup + tooth characterization plan

  1. Digitize master casts/models and record rims in relation.
  2. Mount digitally according to the verified CR/VDO record.
  3. Define the occlusal scheme appropriate for ridge stability and neuromuscular control (case-based).
  4. Plan tooth selection and characterization using clinical references (avoid over-idealized symmetry).

Visit 3 (Clinic): Try-in (recommended) + approval

  • Use a monolithic printed try-in to validate: esthetics, phonetics, midline/canine lines, plane, VDO comfort, stability.
  • Approve or revise with specific change requests (e.g., “+1 mm incisal display”, “reduce buccal corridor fullness”, “adjust smile arc”).

Lab Phase 3 (Lab): Final manufacturing — printed base + milled teeth + bonding

1) Print the final denture base (validated base resin)

  • Follow manufacturer IFU for printing, cleaning, and post-curing.
  • Protect intaglio accuracy: do not over-polish tissue surface.
  • Verify fit on master cast; confirm borders and posterior palatal seal design (if indicated).

2) Fabricate teeth separately (preferred: milled pre-shaded PMMA)

  • Milled PMMA teeth support strong color consistency and predictable finishing.
  • If printed teeth are used, ensure they are validated for denture teeth indication and compatible bonding protocol.

3) Bonding (system-dependent — follow IFU)

  • Surface conditioning per IFU (base + teeth).
  • Use designed mechanical retention (sockets/keys) plus validated chemical bond.
  • Confirm full seating, no gaps, and no positional drift before final cure/finish.
  • Remount/verify occlusion after bonding for final refinement.

Delivery (Clinic): Insertion + refinement + follow-up

  • Pressure indicator evaluation: relieve selective areas without flattening the base.
  • Border comfort and retention check; refine overextensions conservatively.
  • Occlusion verification and selective adjustments according to the planned scheme.
  • Hygiene + adaptation instructions; schedule follow-up (24–72h, then 1–2 weeks).

exocad Denture Module: CAD Steps That Actually Control the Outcome

1) Data import and mounting (do not “guess” CR/VDO)

  • Import edentulous scans + jaw relation record (rims in relation).
  • Confirm orientation: midline, occlusal plane, smile references from photos.
  • Set articulation parameters consistent with the selected occlusal concept (case-based).

2) Tooth selection and setup (characterization starts here)

  • Select mold/size based on facial references and clinical notes (avoid “one-mold fits all”).
  • Establish: midline, canine lines, incisal plane, smile arc, and buccal corridor control.
  • Build natural realism: micro-rotations, embrasures, line angles—without creating instability.
  • Keep symmetry controlled: symmetry is a guideline, not an aesthetic goal.

3) Occlusion concept (choose based on ridge stability)

  • Case-based selection: balanced / lingualized / monoplane (document why).
  • Protect unstable mandibular bases from excessive lateral interferences.
  • Check collisions and contacts digitally, then plan how you will verify clinically at delivery.

4) Base design for the printed-base + bonded-teeth workflow

  • Design tooth sockets/keys to prevent drift during bonding.
  • Control base thickness in functional zones; protect borders and frena.
  • Plan relief areas (sharp crest, thin mucosa, tori) and post-dam where indicated.

5) Output & manufacturing handoff

  • Export separate components (base + teeth) according to your workflow.
  • Ensure your printer/mill settings and materials are validated for dentures.
  • Document orientation and post-cure requirements (IFU) as part of the case file.
Trainer note

Most “digital denture failures” are not software failures—they are record failures (unstable rims, wrong VDO/CR) or QC failures (over-polished intaglio, inaccurate borders, uncontrolled bonding drift).

QC Gates (Copy/Paste Checklist)

  • QC 1 (Clinic – Visit 2): borders complete, base stable, lip support/plane verified, phonetics screened.
  • QC 2 (Clinic – Visit 2): VDR repeatable, VDO verified, CR recorded at VDO, record indexed (no slip).
  • QC 3 (CAD): midline/smile arc/incisal plane confirmed; occlusal scheme documented; sockets/keys designed for bonding.
  • QC 4 (Try-in): esthetics + phonetics + VDO comfort + stability approved (or revisions documented).
  • QC 5 (Post-bond): full tooth seating, clean interfaces, no drift, remount occlusion verified.
  • QC 6 (Delivery): pressure areas relieved, borders comfortable, occlusion refined, follow-up scheduled.

Common Mistakes That Cause Remakes

  1. Skipping rim verification: recording CR/VDO on an unstable rim = unstable dentures.
  2. Under-captured borders: relying on IOS when vestibules/borders are incomplete.
  3. Over-polishing intaglio: destroying tissue surface accuracy and retention.
  4. Over-idealized symmetry: “too perfect” setup reads artificial and can destabilize function.
  5. Bonding drift: no mechanical keys + weak seating control = tooth position changes.
  6. No remount verification: occlusion errors discovered chairside instead of in lab QC.

FAQs

Are printed bases and bonded teeth clinically acceptable for digital complete dentures?

Yes—when validated denture base materials are used and the bonding protocol follows the manufacturer IFU, a printed-base + bonded-teeth workflow is a widely used approach that supports esthetic control and repairability. The clinical outcome still depends on impression accuracy, stable jaw relations (CR/VDO), and quality control.

Do I still need occlusion rims and jaw relation records in a digital workflow?

Yes. Digital complete dentures still depend on verified occlusal plane, lip support, and repeatable maxillomandibular records. CAD improves repeatability after records are correct—it cannot correct inaccurate VDO/CR records.

When should I insist on a try-in appointment?

Insist on a try-in when esthetic risk is high, phonetics are uncertain, VDO tolerance is unclear, or mandibular stability is limited. A try-in is usually faster and cheaper than remaking a final base or re-bonding teeth.

Next Step

If you want to standardize your digital complete dentures workflow (records → CAD → manufacturing → QC) and reduce remakes, explore training tracks and clinical-lab protocols at DDS Courses.

Digital complete dentures lab workflow mindmap showing CAD setup, digital waxing, base design, monolithic try-in printing, final base printing, milled teeth bonding, characterization, and QC gates.

Further reading (evidence):

Occlusion Concept Decision Tool for Digital Complete Dentures

In digital complete dentures (printed bases + bonded teeth), the occlusal concept is chosen to protect retention and stability based on ridge support, base stability, and repeatable jaw records (CR at the selected VDO). This tool suggests a clinically conservative default and gives a short rationale.

1) Ridge support / resorption risk
Key clinical variable: mandibular ridge form, flabby tissue, undercuts, and expected stability after border molding.
2) Denture base stability (record base or verified baseplate)
If the base rocks, CR/VDO record reliability decreases. Fix borders/tissue surface before “upgrading” occlusal anatomy.
3) Neuromuscular control / repeatability
Includes difficulty repeating closure, inconsistent records, significant gag reflex sensitivity, tremor, or poor adaptation history.
4) Parafunction / overload risk
If present, design more conservative cusp form and reduce lateral interferences.
5) Esthetic/phonetic uncertainty (try-in driver)
High smile line demands, uncertain lip support, difficult “S” sounds, or patient expectations that require verification.

Clinical safety rule: If CR at the selected VDO is not repeatable on validated rims/bases, prioritize base stability + rim verification first. Occlusal scheme cannot compensate for unstable foundations.

Clinical Self-Check (Flash Cards): Digital Complete Dentures

Quick, clinical MCQs focused on CR + VDO, occlusal concept selection, and printed base + bonded teeth QC. Swipe like flash cards, then get your % score and unlock the PDF protocol.

8 Questions Swipe to Navigate Score + PDF Unlock
Question 1 of 9

1) In digital complete dentures, what most often creates “occlusion problems” after delivery?

2) Best rule before recording CR/VDO on occlusion rims:

3) For most moderate-stability cases, the best default occlusal concept is:

4) Monoplane is most indicated when:

5) Bilateral balanced occlusion becomes risky when:

6) In printed base + bonded teeth, the most critical bonding QC is:

7) A try-in is most valuable when:

8) The CAD/setup mistake most linked to tipping after delivery:

Finish & Get Your Score

Your score: —%

🔒 PDF locked until you share Download PDF: Complete Denture Occlusion Protocol

We unlock after you click any share button (honor system). Keeping it lightweight protects speed and SEO.

Tip: Swipe cards on mobile. On desktop, use Next/Prev.

Professional tip: aim for ≥80% before you standardize your workflow.

CLICK HERE & GET FREE COMPLETE DENTURE CHECKLIST !
Digital complete denture CAD design showing full-arch tooth setup, gingival base contours, and border outlines for 3D printed denture base and bonded teeth workflow.

Join Our Course

Digital Smile Design

& 3D Printing with Inox